How come this stuff is so obtuse.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_histories
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-consistent-histories/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-04024-z
The nature article is particularly egregious. Word soup. Worse than my worst writings.
But I *think* this actually aligns with my ideas about the past not being a "real" thing. Just why is it so damn obtuse...
No comments:
Post a Comment