Alan Watts died way before the Internet was a thing, but this didn't stop his talks on "philosophy" being perpetually popular on online media platforms. I never really spent time perusing them but whenever I come across them they never fail to impress. Quite hypnotizing really. I suspect that the answers he found to Important Questions of Life are pretty similar to what I found myself (albeit I probably disagree with him on some minor points).
And after all these years, I've started to believe that, even though truth is inherently subjective, there are models of truth that lead to a labyrinth of never-ending questions (the stuff that PhD in Philosophy theses are made of), and there are models that are (relatively) clear, concise and satisfactory -- and the latter ones lead to better answers for Important Questions of Life... and the answers do generally converge, perhaps because the number solutions decrease as you optimize for some attributes.
Yet the funny thing is, there's actually no "objective" meaning to finding the solutions to these Questions. Any notion that these solutions help one solve practical problems in real life are probably misguided, although sometimes it might help you in making slightly better decisions -- but so would pretty much any arbitrary/complicated belief system that has withstood Darwinistic trials.
So in the end it is just like solving riddles. The journey is more important than the destination. There's no medal or achievement for solving them, and it's even meaningless to discuss them among people who have already solved them. There's occasionally some fun in hinting the way towards the solution for those who haven't got it yet, but in retrospect even that might be considered an unnecessary spoiler.
----------
No comments:
Post a Comment