Saturday, May 11, 2024

投資嘅能量

其實我一直都對自己坐擁唔算細嘅資產感到唔係好自在 
(...多謝你哋嘅好意但唔使喇多謝 [見下])


話晒古今中外各位老師都唔係好鼓勵守財奴,話財富要分享先有意義,最好散盡家財,唔係淨係用喺自己身上。

但呢幾日我再從豐足(abundance)嘅角度諗多幾下,發現現代人處理資產原來同古代嘅「守財奴」係好唔同嘅玩法。

以前啲人嘅資產基本上係 commodities (包括金幣銀幣) 同 土地,同人「分享」嘅方法唔多。如果唔係「散盡家財」嘅玩法,大概就係借出去(錢)或租出去(地)。  但由於借錢風險比較大,我諗最多都係將土地租出去。

但現代金融體制令到發放資產嘅玩法多咗好多。例如所有形式嘅「投資」(唔係投機)理論上都係一種「送錢出去俾人(做生意)」嘅形式。

可能會有人覺得「投資」有錢賺唔算做「善事」,所以就唔會有傳統意義嘅「積德」嘅效果。我唔知炒股有冇「積德」,但如果用一個比較現代啲嘅「能量流動」講法,掉啲錢落股票市場確實係一種極有效將資金能力流動嘅方法嚟。而你實際上做緊嘅嘢,又確實係將你用唔著嘅財富交俾其他「更需要」呢筆錢嘅人 (假設你入貨個價位夠低)。至於投資好多時賺返有凸呢樣嘢,其實唔係負面嘢嚟,反而可以係豐足嘅一種體現。始終「倒錢落海」形式嘅「積德」實在太過 zero sum,實際嘅操作稍為有種「懲罰」成功搵到錢嘅人嘅鄉愿感覺。如果我哋唔係習慣咗妖魔化「貪念」呢樣嘢,其實你分享財富出去,梗係想對世界有最大正面效果(EA撚散退!),而「投資回報」都算係一個幾合理嘅 metric。

我唔係否定嗰啲「散盡家財」嘅玩法,只係講緊現代社會有啲新嘅方便玩法,仲係反 zero sum 反誅心論 (i.e. 貪) 嘅豐足玩法。

That said,既然能量呢家嘢部份取決於心態,我就好懷疑嗰啲短炒、玩牛熊證之類嘅玩法包唔包喇。

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

Aphantasia

I almost forgot this stuff:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphantasia

This seems to explain quite a few things.

In particular, the difference in self-reported visual imagery of mystical experiences.

That probably means unless I somehow drastically rewire myself, I won't be able to visually "see" whatever stuff people are reporting to see.

Which I guess is a good thing. Forms are often deceiving (or at least distracting).

Tuesday, May 7, 2024

占卜

https://www.threads.net/@chelse_hiulaam/post/C6rEfVNP5wy

喺脆上面見到有人話幫人抽牌交流下能量,咁冇理由唔玩下㗎 (?)

結果比想像中更好玩,如果我多份少女心就可能會沉迷抽牌

完全唔明佢點樣由啲牌可以interpret到佢講嘅嘢出嚟... 真係犀利

另外話說佢副牌好靚。



Monday, May 6, 2024

Murphy's Law vs Positive Thinking

(Half-written by Github copilot, so the tone is a bit weird)

Murphy's law is actually quite interesting.

It is generally stated as such: "Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong."

It has been applied to many different situations, but it is most commonly used in engineering and technology. It is to some extent an empirical statement that things tend to go wrong, and it is also a rather uncontroversial observation of the simple fact that the more complex a system is, the chances of something going wrong increases as the scale of the operations increases.

However, there is also a more esoteric interpretation of Murphy's law, i.e. things will actually go wrong even more often than what might be expected from a simple frequentist probabilistic analysis. In short, "I have really bad luck."

There are many possible ways one might try to avoid Murphy's law. The first is to minimize the chances of things going wrong by making sure that the system is as simple as possible, and that all possible failure modes are dealt with. This is the approach taken by most engineers and scientists, and it probably the most effective way to avoid Murphy's law.

However, those who believe in mind over matter might also try to avoid Murphy's law by simply thinking positively and expecting things to go right. This is the approach taken by many people who believe in the power of positive thinking.

But does positive thinking really work? Can you really avoid Murphy's law by simply thinking positively and expecting things to go right? If you believe in the power of positive thinking, then you might think that the answer is yes. But why doesn't it work? Why do things still go wrong even when you think positively?

The answer is that the very idea of "positive" thinking is flawed. If you need to think "positively" to avoid Murphy's law, then you are already assuming that things will go wrong. In other words, you are already expecting things to go wrong, and you are trying to counteract that expectation by thinking positively. But this is a self-defeating strategy, because you are still expecting things to go wrong, and you are still giving power to the idea that things will go wrong.

What can we do then? Remember that the law of free will is a universal law, and that we have the power to choose our own destiny. If you want to avoid Murphy's law, then you need to take physical action to make sure that things go right. You need to take responsibility for your own actions, and you need to make sure that you are doing everything in your power to make sure that things go right. Unsurprisingly, this approach converges with the boring materialist approach.

Those who believe in the power of positive thinking generally forget that we live in a physical universe, and there is a reason for that. Minds can move matter, but the accepted laws here is that we interact with the physical world through our physical bodies. If you want to avoid Murphy's law, then you need to take physical action. As they say, "actions speak louder than words."

In a sense, Murphy's law is a device where it gives us a choice. We can either accept that things will go wrong, and take physical action to make sure that they don't.

As a rule of thumb, it is obviously a good idea to maintain a generally positive vibe, but once you consider a negative outcome as a possibility, it is on you to take action to minimize the possibility of it eventually happening.

Thursday, May 2, 2024

進退

雖然話我應該係要學習點樣「無分別心」

但總係好想印證下呢大半年思想有冇進步

每次都係覺得,其實所有概念嘅「種子」喺十年八載之前已經完成,而家只係不斷重新翻兜炒作。

但事實上我理解嘅嘢真係成熟咗。舊酒新瓶得嚟啲酒確實係醇咗。


但我本身係想⋯⋯更加 profound 咁。

可能本身唔應該有呢個 expectation。

-------

又話說,所有睇得明嘅嘢,其實真係要自己先明咗,然後睇資料 (書、片、etc.) 嗰陣先知佢講乜。否則其實係點睇都唔會明。


Midnight Gospel

 What the heck.....


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Midnight_Gospel


What the...

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

宗教

宗教本身係比較難「明」嘅。

我唔係講啲教義難明。如果你純粹係一個教徒,咁啲教義冇咩特別難,聽完,信,照做,大概就算係完成咗流程。

但只要認真去推敲啲經文經書,就會見到好多有趣但同啲普遍流傳嘅教義唔同嘅地方。呢樣嘢唔多需要你好叻都睇得出,只要你肯認真嘗試理解每一隻字每一句,就會見到啲有趣 (但唔明)嘅嘢。

唔明係可以唔理嘅,因為真係難明。


真係明白宗教,係要自己認真諗過點樣 structure 一個宗教體系出嚟。要有核心教義,要有宣傳手法,要有入會門檻,要有初楷簡化版教材,要有門規法矩,要有培訓核心成員同接班人嘅程序,等等。

以上都只不過係世俗嘢。

但宗教基本上係一個傳承神秘超自然力量嘅載體(vessel)嚟,當中多咗好多考量。由於超自然力量本身有少少危險性 (可能唔只少少...),大眾接觸到嘅簡化版教材係唔會直接教佢哋呢啲嘢。但,你唔好彩嘅話,核心成員都未必真係會學得識,何況宗教壯大之後,主要係靠啲未登門弟嘅教眾流傳。所以「宗教」呢個載體係要有方法將啲資訊由唔識嘅人口中傳承後世,等有緣嘅人接觸到之後明白佢講乜。所以有呢堆咁嘅考量,加上你又想一般信眾信咗你套嘢之後都有啲好處,唔想當佢哋只係信念同資訊嘅 substrate,咁就成個宗教構造就差唔多只可以咁運作。


望到《金剛經》入面一句好感慨:

若當來世,後五百歲,其有眾生得聞是經,信解受持,是人即為第一希有

佢哋真係唔係 expect 一般人明白。

但勁就勁在,佢唔止係流傳到五百年,而家二千五百都嚟緊。到今日大家終於知道咩係 virtualization,點解 XX 非 XX 是名 XX。我哋亦終於知道物理現像唯物主義係真係無「我相、人相、眾生相、壽者相」... 只有一堆基礎能量嘅互動。

正如我之前講笑咁講,《金剛經》嘅「金剛」梵文本身可以解「閃電」同「鑽石」,正正係對應上個世紀先出現嘅 silicon semiconductor (silicon 有 diamond cubic crystal structure, 通電, 係我哋呢個世代講虛擬嘢嘅基礎技術) -- 如果唔係點解要叫「金剛經」? 真係講到好似佢係為咗流傳兩三千年等到呢個年代先expect人明白嘅玩法嚟。

當然最搞笑就係唔會有人覺得呢種詮釋係啱。因為實在太痴線,匪夷所思。

但我就係匪嘛。究竟啲資訊點樣流傳同傳承,我已經不斷喺度諗。出面嘅人 99% 唔明,可以點搞? 啲方法唔係太多,都係嗰三幅被,所以睇住人哋點做,自然就心神領會。

(好彩我主要嘅問題唔係五百年後有冇人睇得明⋯)