concentration of probabilities

諗起都唔止一次密集式撞到人

例如之前嗰晚同某某食完飯或一大班人聚會，第二日就又撞到佢咁。

幾有趣。

老豆以前都會話，啲較少類型嘅症都係平時冇，一嚟就同一日幾個咁。Hong Kali都係咁講。

 唔知有啲咩特別意義，純粹係有趣嘅觀察

Compatible Logic

Perhaps there could be a system of logic where instead of proposition only by deduction, we allow propositions that are compatible.

That way, we don't need axioms. Instead the concept of abundance can be observed, where as long as things don't contradict, they exist and are all true.

It may be the case that such systems require a minimum level of inclusiveness to work. Or perhaps it implies a minimum level of inclusiveness.

An interesting exercise would be to consider how many related things can be put in such a system before you start getting contradictions?

功德

以前我會以為呢啲一派胡言，但經歷過之後先會知道係唯一正道。

至於點解？ 可能要等多幾年我先有可能諗到點解..

 

NDE

Some say that "near death experiences" may provide some insight as to what happens after death, while might think that "near death" is not "death" so the "near death" experiences are of little relevance to what actually happens upon "death".

Previously I tended to be of the latter camp, but recently I realized that because death is by definition an irreversible process (if anything, religious dogma stipulates this), it follows from the definition that anyone who is alive must not have gone through true death.

Now, this is just a quirk of semantics, and should not actually inform us of whether NDEs can be viewed as DEs. In particular, if we posit that people can actually return to the living after going through death, at least some NDEs can actually be considered true DEs.

Can people return from death? 

Well. Once you drop the axiom that "one cannot return from death", then "death" is rather hard to define. But it seems quite possible if you read enough stories.  The thing is I'm not sure whether all returns are to the same universe...

Perspective

Is there a way to see the world from without a perspective?

This is a question that ought to be pondered upon.

We always say we ought to be objective, i.e. we should drop our subjective perspectives in favor of a neutral one. But aside of the fact that objectiveness usually means mere inter-subjectiveness (i.e. social niceties), it must be pointed out that we actually do not know how to perceive without a perspective.

That without a perspective is omniscience.

P

美好嘅世界，你好呀

美好世界嘅我，早晨

我哋以滿懷感激嘅心情

迎接今日嘅挑戰

中介

早幾日同朋友講起理論上天主教聖職唔會因為個人改變信仰而被收回或消失，甚至如果神職人員唔抱住信念咁舉辦儀式，只要信眾自己相信，咁神就仍然可以透過呢個失去信仰但有聖職嘅人得到聖靈。

呢樣嘢提醒咗我，中介其實可以冇神通嘅。甚至可以話，冇神通嘅中介先至係最好嘅中介。

例如，占卜師叫客人抽塔羅牌，然後占卜師照書解說，應該就係冇運用神通嘅做法。有時占卜師用自己嘅其他方法見到更多資訊，咁就係用自己神通去幫人算命。

而「冇神通嘅中介先至係最好嘅中介」呢一點，大概可以成為 AI 算命嘅理論基礎。

大部份嘅占卜系統都係相對「簡單」嘅，因為直至近年，人類都冇辦法做大型運算，所以算出嚟嘅結果，通常都係幾十種變化，然後仍然要靠占卜師同客人自己將呢啲結果套用返喺實際情況。有時占卜師喺呢個時候會唔覺意用咗自己嘅能量。

但有咗 large language model 其實占卜師呢個位置理論上可以完全被取代。只要問卜者信就 ok 。

至於啲系統點搞，真係唯有講句「冇傳承加持就唯有自己爭氣啲」。當然，啱啱叫 LLaMA2 幫我算個卦，佢聲稱用易經算出嚟，講咗一堆嘢，望落去貌似都唔算太差。但我生平冇去算過命，所以都唔知係咪真係咁樣。