曾經話「承諾就係預言」。我今日都認為係咁。
但近日開始懷疑除咗「先知力」之外係咪仲有樣類似「選擇未來」嘅能力?始終「發現自己咁啱喺一個自己所預言嘅世界」呢種能力,同純粹好旁觀者咁樣「預見然後同人講會發生咩事」有少少分別,前者嘅因果互動性比較強,有神力牽絆。
曾經話「承諾就係預言」。我今日都認為係咁。
但近日開始懷疑除咗「先知力」之外係咪仲有樣類似「選擇未來」嘅能力?始終「發現自己咁啱喺一個自己所預言嘅世界」呢種能力,同純粹好旁觀者咁樣「預見然後同人講會發生咩事」有少少分別,前者嘅因果互動性比較強,有神力牽絆。
Under subjective truth, given that subjective beliefs are real, it's easy to construct basically infinite amounts of multiverses, considering that I have a mental model of many things, including other people's mental model, and their mental model of my mental model, ad infinitum.
If drawn on a comic, it's like every thought bubble is its own universe, and the thought bubbles within are universes within them. And in a sense, while they are all imperfect copies of "this reality", they are no less real. The mere difference is that we don't *experience* them like we experience ourselves. But given that in the inter-subjective truth regime, we presume that the mental reality of other "real people" in "this reality" is real, even if we don't directly experience them, it seems only consistent to presume that the recursive multiverses are real too.
Now. What if there's some way these things interact between each other in the same way as quantum mechanics... can thoughts "destructive interfere" with another's probability curve?
Perhaps art was truly invented to communicate with the divine.
Dance and music are universally used in rituals for inducing trance. Paintings are records of imagery seen from the beyond.
It's a pity that I only know writing. Not to say it doesn't work (pretty sure it works somewhat - I learn by reading my own writing so there's that), but I suppose the tradition of writing isn't as well established. The grass is always greener on the other side.
There are only suggestions, and suggestions only.
We are just indoctrinated to absolutism and tyranny.
公廁臉書帳號本身有呢句,好似寫咗喺 religious views 嗰欄:
God is the universe, and I am at its center.
由於公廁刪咗,少少唔想呢句遺失,就寫住喺度先。
今日可能執少少字眼:
God is all, and I am at its center.
譯埋中文:
神即萬物,我在其中。