Friday, March 14, 2025

Objective Function of Intelligence

After a decade or so of "machine learning" in the 21st century, arguably the only important lesson is what they call the "Bitter Lesson", which tells us that, with the current level of computation power we have, just saying what you want and performing gradient descent is more than enough. As long as we have an objective function that is composed of differentiable functions, we can just shove FLOPS into it and make it work.  

As such, the most valuable thing on Earth right now, something that would be worth trillions of USD, is an objective function of intelligence.

The fact that we can't define intelligence, but depend on it, is a really really interesting fact.

What does it mean? It means that intelligence is not a simple thing we can objectively (as opposed to subjectively) define. Instead, it depends on human judgments. In particular, value judgments.

This is not to say that value judgments are the only thing important for intelligence. But it is a dependency.

In contrast, the kind of intelligence that does not require human value judgments is simply what we call computation. We have formal frameworks to define and validate computation. The reason we can't apply those things to general intelligence is the dependency on human judgment.

This kind of means "we" (collectively) get to choose. Choice. Free Will.

Ah yes. The most valuable thing in the 21st century is our collective free will. 

Of course this also means that we don't have an "objective" function of intelligence in that the function must be subjective to the user's choices.

To me, this is almost a fulfillment of the idea of "ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you." (Matthew 7:7)

To those who have not yet experienced providence, it is difficult to accept that the limit on ourselves is not lack of substance, but that we don't yet know what we truly desire. And now the trillion dollar objective function is staring directly at us. This is not "heaven on earth" yet for sure, but divine concepts do manifest in such similar worldly forms.

Wednesday, March 12, 2025

Timescales

A reply I made on HN that is generally applicable (even devoid of context):


Apparently there's a quote attributed to Bill Gates: "people overestimate what they can do in one year and underestimate what they can do in 10 years."

People overestimate the changes that could happen within a couple years, and totally underestimate the changes that would happen in decades.

Perhaps it's a consequence of change having some kind of exponential behavior. The first couple years might not feel like anything in absolute terms, but give it 10 or 20 years and you'll see a huge change in retrospect.

IMHO, I don't think anyone needs to panic now, changes happen fast these days but I don't think things are going to drastically change in these ~2-3 years. But the world is probably going to look very different in 20 years, and in retrospect it will be attributed to seeds planted in these couple years.

In short I think both camps are right, except on different timescales.



Thursday, March 6, 2025

先知力

其實我真係好尊敬史兄嘅人品同能力

但咁樣真係有少少燈




高位燈完燈埋低谷... 完美 timing









cogito ergo sum

It is really hard to not see an alternative to a "rationalist" thinking of the expression "cogito ergo sum" given that God self-introduced as ""Ego sum qui sum".

The "I am" (to be / existence) symbolism is in all important places right in front of our eyes. For example, in Taoism it is "自然" (自 = self, 然 = to be).

Thought brings existence into being.

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

吓,原來 Dokibird 係(廣義)香港人嚟?

啱啱先見到條片佢講廣東話

心諗

我舊年食咗佢咁大粒花生

都唔知原來佢識講廣東話

Sunday, March 2, 2025

Hardcore WoW


 

Based comment on the "Classic Hardcore Moments" channel. 

About hardcore wow, or on reincarnation?