
I'm sort of a fan of this author. His first book "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" had a couple of insightful interpretations of human history. His second book, "Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow" was a wild exercise of speculating the future of humanity, which sounded scary yet plausible.
The first few chapters of his latest book, "21 Lessons for the 21st Century", sounded like a much better version of my writings over these couple of years. The main thrust was to be wary of automation and AI, and beware of the few elite who own massive amounts of data. There was a paragraph in which a side by side comparison was funny enough --

For the rest of the book, I didn't quite get the focus, if there was one. It felt like were dozens of individual commentaries on different issues pasted together in one single book. It's still definitely worth reading if only for the scattered nuggets of insights here and there, but it didn't really have the kind of coherence you'd have come to expect in his earlier works. I suppose that's fair, since the 21 lessons per the title already implies a certain amount of discreteness in the content.
Perhaps the author was trying to be subtle, but there were chapters in which he simply laid out the issues without apparently trying to propose a solution or a preferred perspective. Perhaps those issues are too sensitive these days for anyone to say anything on the subject without offending somebody. I dunno.